I had a great lunch today with a friend, which made me think how much I like having lunch.
It’s by far the best meal compared to its rivals; breakfast is fun but way too rushed, and dinner can be warm and cozy at times, but they’re a bit too moody and almost always sad when it’s done, pointing towards the end.
Let’s be very honest and objective here, except for Turkish breakfast, which, to be fair, is more of a holiday fantasy than a daily routine; morning food is just not exciting or nuanced. It’s just some extra calories in the form of “chocolate bread” or “just bread” that don’t serve almost anything. If you eat meat, one can argue that bacon and eggs are actually pretty good. But are they really? Are either really good? Or is it just a bit better in comparison to those mostly dry pastries that we are grateful to have for breakfast? The standard is pretty low. And dinner… The expectation for good food is way too high. Can you imagine the repercussions of having an unsatisfying evening feast? There is no coming back from that. Can you imagine Jesus having a bad or OK last meal? How sad is that? Had it been a bad lunch, you can just have a laugh and say, “Listen, let’s just leave this place and move on with our day; we still have a lot of time!”
Lunch is rarely about the food itself — although good food tastes even better at noon — but about what comes before and after. That coffee after lunch might take you anywhere.
I’ve been thinking of my two perfect lunch scenarios, and here they are.